Legal · Contract review
Contract review and obligation extraction
Turn an uploaded agreement into a risk summary, redline suggestions, and obligations, while counsel controls every legal decision and document change.
Illustrative product view
run_contract_intelligence_01
An agreement is uploaded or a contract intake is submitted.
Trigger captured
Clauses and obligations are extracted
Evidence attached
Risk and suggestions are drafted
Evidence attached
Human decision required
Terminal approval step
The operating problem
Where the process breaks.
Legal teams repeatedly locate non-standard language, compare playbooks, and extract obligations before they can advise the business. Generated interpretations and redlines need evidence and must remain proposals until counsel decides.
Governed execution
How the work runs.
Order remains explicit from trigger to decision. Every step runs inside the tools, data scope, and policy assigned to this workflow.
- 01Trigger
Agreement enters review
The document, agreement type, counterparty, and approved playbook are attached to the intake.
- 02Agent
Clauses and obligations are extracted
The agent identifies configured clauses, dates, parties, obligations, and missing language with page references.
- 03Agent
Risk and suggestions are drafted
The workflow compares extracted language with the approved playbook and prepares evidence-linked suggestions.
- 04Human
Counsel makes the legal decision
Counsel approves, edits, or rejects the risk assessment, suggestions, and obligation record as the terminal step.
Decision boundary
Human approval is the boundary.
The approval node is terminal today. A post-approval send or write happens only through a separate manual or newly triggered continuation.
Required decision
Counsel approves every redline suggestion, obligation, and non-standard clause decision; the workflow does not mutate the agreement after approval.
Approval recorded
Actor, decision, edits, and timestamp join the receipt.
Separate continuation
External write
Nothing resumes silently after the human decision.
Proof of execution
Execution receipt.
The output is not just a result. It carries the trigger, evidence, proposed actions, decision, and final workflow state.
Illustrative receipt
sample · run_contract_intelligence_01
- Agreement hash, type, and playbook version
- captured · evidence_01
- Extracted clauses with page references
- captured · evidence_02
- Playbook comparison and risk rationale
- captured · evidence_03
- Proposed redline suggestions and obligations
- captured · evidence_04
- Counsel edits and terminal decision
- approved · continuation_not_started
Output · A risk summary, proposed redline suggestions, extracted obligations, and counsel decision receipt.
Connected work
Example systems in this workflow
These are illustrative system choices, not a claim that every one is a native connector. Configure supported native tools, MCP servers, OpenAPI imports, or approved HTTP tools for your environment.
Deployment boundary
Run the workflow in Zilionix Cloud, inside your VPC, or through the self-hosted deployment path while keeping organization-scoped data and credentials inside the selected boundary.
Zilionix Cloud
Your VPC
Self-hosted
Policy before autonomy
Guardrails for this run.
Every finding cites the agreement location and playbook rule used.
The system presents legal analysis as a proposal for counsel review.
The approval node is terminal and does not apply document changes.
Agreement access follows organization and matter-level permissions.
External evidence
Benchmark the opportunity.
This source illustrates the surrounding business problem. It is not a Zilionix deployment, customer result, or performance guarantee.
Bring this workflow into view.
Map the trigger, tools, approval boundary, and execution receipt against the way your team already works.