People · Retention signals
Engagement signals and retention review
Turn aggregated pulse-survey and feedback signals into restricted team-level themes, while HR controls privacy review and every proposed intervention.
Illustrative product view
run_engagement_pulse_01
A scheduled pulse-survey or employee-feedback batch reaches its configured review window.
Trigger captured
Signals are aggregated
Evidence attached
Restricted brief is drafted
Evidence attached
Human decision required
Terminal approval step
The operating problem
Where the process breaks.
Pulse surveys and employee feedback reach decision-makers in separate reports and often after patterns have become persistent. Interpretation is sensitive and requires cohort thresholds, restricted access, privacy review, and careful human judgment.
Governed execution
How the work runs.
Order remains explicit from trigger to decision. Every step runs inside the tools, data scope, and policy assigned to this workflow.
- 01Trigger
Review window opens
A schedule selects the approved feedback batch, period, and minimum cohort thresholds.
- 02Agent
Signals are aggregated
The agent reads permitted pulse and feedback summaries without exposing raw private messages or producing individual attrition scores.
- 03Agent
Restricted brief is drafted
The workflow explains team-level themes, uncertainty, and possible non-punitive interventions.
- 04Human
HR reviews privacy and context
An HR business partner validates privacy, cohort, aggregation, and organizational context as the terminal step.
Decision boundary
Human approval is the boundary.
The approval node is terminal today. A post-approval send or write happens only through a separate manual or newly triggered continuation.
Required decision
An HR business partner validates privacy, cohort, aggregation, context, and intervention language; any manager alert requires a separate continuation.
Approval recorded
Actor, decision, edits, and timestamp join the receipt.
Separate continuation
External write
Nothing resumes silently after the human decision.
Proof of execution
Execution receipt.
The output is not just a result. It carries the trigger, evidence, proposed actions, decision, and final workflow state.
Illustrative receipt
sample · run_engagement_pulse_01
- Review period and cohort threshold
- captured · evidence_01
- Permitted aggregate signal categories
- captured · evidence_02
- Uncertainty, cohort, and privacy-check results
- captured · evidence_03
- HR review and approved intervention
- captured · evidence_04
- HR decision and continuation status
- approved · continuation_not_started
Output · Restricted team-level themes, proposed interventions, HR decision, and receipt.
Connected work
Example systems in this workflow
These are illustrative system choices, not a claim that every one is a native connector. Configure supported native tools, MCP servers, OpenAPI imports, or approved HTTP tools for your environment.
Deployment boundary
Run the workflow in Zilionix Cloud, inside your VPC, or through the self-hosted deployment path while keeping organization-scoped data and credentials inside the selected boundary.
Zilionix Cloud
Your VPC
Self-hosted
Policy before autonomy
Guardrails for this run.
Minimum cohort thresholds reduce inappropriate individual inference.
Raw private message content is excluded from the workflow.
Access is restricted to named people-analytics and HR roles.
Individual attrition scores and automated employment decisions are excluded.
No manager alert occurs in the approval run.
External evidence
Benchmark the opportunity.
This source illustrates the surrounding business problem. It is not a Zilionix deployment, customer result, or performance guarantee.
Bring this workflow into view.
Map the trigger, tools, approval boundary, and execution receipt against the way your team already works.